Sunday, May 22, 2011

Weeds.



Season one of Showtime's hit series Weeds premiered in 2005. The pilot episode featured the development of the ethically questionable protagonist Nancy Botwin. Nancy Botwin is a house wife who was recently widowed, now faced with the sole provider for her upper middle class suburban family. The answer to Nancy's financial woes lies in selling Marijuana, her client base begins small mainly consisting of the parents in her luxurious town then escalates into a store fronted as a bakery used to distribute her product. Although Weeds is fronted as a parody of suburban life, filled with stereotypes of race, class and gender, they are all delivered in a ironic comical way. For this text I will examine the story arch of the first seasons of Weeds limiting the focus to Nancy Botwin's interactions with the ideologies of race, class and gender that are highlighted within the first season.

Masked by humor there is evidence that reinforces the symbolic annihilation that states if you are not male white and straight you are irrelevant to society. This can be taken lightly in a society where irony thrives, however the existence of such ideology represents the current existence that could be interpreted as something we are just laughing at or that we are so desensitized to seeing such an existence in various media texts we can easily find humor in it.

Although it seems as though my sense of humor is absent when really I find this show hilarious, however the overall claim I would like to make is that, however the fact that Weeds is funny could be passively be reinforcing the “norms” that can be both oppressive and insulting. The first scene I will examine within this ideological analysis is the introduction and theme song of the show, which depicts the conformity of a 9-5 suburban community, which will lead me to the topics of race, class, gender and the American Dream.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8StRAJ
Cork
INTRO LINK

Saturday, May 14, 2011

Gentrification PDX




Gentrification in Portland has become a reoccurring story using both mainstream local and new forms of media. In a story published on the Oregonian web page on April 30th 2011, a subjective point of view was taken from the perspective of a 31 year old woman noticing the changes her North Portland neighborhood has experienced over the years. This Portlander states that she has noticed that the upscale boutiques and shops in North Portland don't reach out to minorities. The rise of these shops has raised the rent in these neighborhoods that has pushed many who have lived there their whole lives. Oregonlive's coverage is great since it has a personal point of view on this change as well as the opportunity for readers of the story to comment on this.


Since the story of Portland's gentrification has been a running story throughout the past few years, I chose to look through the archives of Youtube for videos on Portlander's take on the gentrification. One stream of videos involved a group of people interviewing Portlander's on the gentrification of Portland and it's impact on those effected by the rising rent costs as well as the change in demographics for the shops and eateries around the North Portland area. This is considered a form of new media that has provided thorough coverage for it involves people to voice their opinions of gentrification much like how those reading Oregonlive.com readers can comment on stories.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OH2SWZx16mA&feature=relmfu

Friday, May 6, 2011

Fantastic Four Vol 1!!!



For this assignment I chose to read my roommate's copy of Marvel Comics Ultimate Fantastic Four Volume 1. Before picking up this comic book I must say that I had no prior knowledge about the Fantastic Four (despite the movie hype) or really any knowledge about the possible topics for ideology in comic books due to the fact that I haven't read one since I was six. I was indeed surprised to find an example of gender ideology within the first few pages. Richard Reed (Mister Fantastico before he obtained his powers) and his relationship with his father.

The scene begins with Richard Reed and Ben Grimm, Reeds only friend who happens to act like a body guard for him against middle school bully's, walking into Reed's house. Reeds mother greets him with worry when she sees that he has been beat up. His Hulk of a father enters into the scene furious to see his wimpy son has been beat up again. Reed's father is disappointed in him for not sticking up for himself, he thanks Ben for sticking up for his son in away that is belittling to his son. His father begins to rave about Ben and how all of the other dads are amazed by his football talents, while Reed is standing below them.

As seen below the scene features Ben and Reed's father who have similar build as well as Reed who is smaller. The illustrator has added the perspective that gives the appearance to the drawing that both of Reed's parents as well as his sister, who appears to be younger than him, proportionately larger than Reed. This shows that Reed does not live up to the expectations his father had for him to be, athletic, built and tough like he is. Reed therefore considered himself a disappointment even though he is a very intelligent kid. This particular scene in this comic book relates to what we were talking about in class about symbolic annihilation, in that Reed's father views him as submissive, invisible and victimized because he does not fall into the ideology he holds for men. This image also depicts disappointment since Reed's back is turned and he is looking down while everyone else's faces are seen and they are looking down at Reed.

Monday, May 2, 2011

Breaking News: Portland Oregon


I live in a fairly residential neighborhood in North East Portland Surrounded by Portland Public Schools. Therefore my neighborhood has been plastered with yellow signs indicating that they will vote “yes” to the May 17th election for the bond to renovate the Portland schools if left unattended to could pose a danger to the children attending them. This is breaking news in Portland for many voters claim that the bond of 543 million is too high and will leave Portlanders paying 290 dollars towards this project. The imposing side insists that, the poor structures of the schools on average built between the 1950s and 1960s will have serious repercussions to the children such as, pipes that leak asbestos and boilers that pose a fire softy hazard. I feel that this is the number one story around Portland since it effects Portland school children; they should have a safe environment to learn and grow. This is also a timely issue since the ballots have just come in the mail and the election will occur within the next couple weeks.

The second important story around Portl
and was the shooting of 14 year old Shiloh Hampton in Holladay Park near the Lloyd Center on April 18th 2011. It was a shock to me to hear that this had happened in my neighborhood. This has not been the only shooting that has occurred in my neighborhood, just last year another person had been shot just a few blocks away. This story has been a heartbreaking story that has caught the attention of many Portlanders and their desire for a crackdown on violence. I walk through Holladay park at least once a day, I see so many children, families, innocent people and kids I fear for their safety and I feel terrible that an innocent young man was killed.

All around Portland and the metro area, many had all night parties many hotels had rooms full of people staying up to watch the Royal Wedding. Unlike the billions of people around the world who were glued to the television on April 29th in the early hours of the morning, I must say I did not watch the Royal Wedding. However despite my feelings of ridiculousness towards the Royal wedding, I had a flaming curiosity that I was almost embarrassed of the next day to take a look at what the Bride wore. After looking at photos of her gown, I wound up spending a good ten minutes checking out pictures of horse drawn carriages, the streets of England filled with thousands of people, “was this really a wedding or a parade? I asked myself. I believe that my curiosity as well as the hype this wedding has gotten is due to the ideology of marriage that a majority of us possess within us. This wedding happened to be a spectacle unattainable by the viewers. My mother, a seamstress and fashion fanatic has read that many wedding dress designers will be making replica of Kate Middleton's dress, thus further proving that this spectacle will be the expectation to live up to. I feel that this was an important story around Portland as well as the rest of the world since it was almost an escape from reality. Since the news is usually filled with depressing stories of disaster and death it's a nice distraction for a change.